Offsets are a popular climate action tool – but do they actually discourage stronger, more meaningful acts of climate change reduction? We explore.
Carbon Offset are a mechanism for reducing emissions and curbing climate change by purchasing credits from another project that has achieved similar emission reductions. But do offsets actually discourage more robust, meaningful action on climate change? We answer this question and explore the pros and cons of offsets.
What Are Climate Change Offsets?
Climate change offset are credits generated by a third-party project which, when purchased, cancel out an equivalent amount of emissions from the buyer — usually in the form of carbon dioxide. These projects can include renewable energy projects, reforestation efforts, and methane capture initiatives to name a few. In theory, offsets allow companies to purchase credits to offset their own emissions rather than reducing them directly or investing in more meaningful actions.
The Pros and Cons of Climate Change Offsets:
Although carbon offsets can provide a financial and practical way to reduce emissions, they come with their own set of problems. Implementing offsets within a company’s own operations ensures that emissions reduce simultaneously with the activities creating them. Furthermore, while offsets can be relatively cheap, they do not guarantee long-term emission reductions — something government policy mandates would do better. Finally, without strong regulations and enforcement in place, companies could find themselves buying offsets that are not truly offsetting their equivalent amount of emissions.
How to Take Meaningful Climate Change Action:
Analysing the Efficiency of Carbon Offsets:
Offsets are typically achieved through carbon credits, where organizations or companies buy credits on a carbon-offsetting market. Generally, offsets aim to financially incentivize emission reduction, but they may not always effectively decrease the release of greenhouse gases. This is because offsets do not necessarily equal environmental impact: the effectiveness of offsets depends on how much and how frequently CO2 is emitted and whether the offset projects actually achieve their reduction goals. Offsets can create perverse incentives, letting companies pay for inadequate emission reductions instead of investing in substantial clean energy infrastructure.